AI as Electricity: Turning High Voltage into Everyday Use
Not just brighter bulbs, but safer grids.
When Thomas Edison first lit up the streets of New York, people saw it as nothing short of a miracle. Crowds gathered to marvel at the glow of electric light, a glimpse of the future. But early electricity was unstable and dangerous—sparks caused fires, exposed wires killed, and the system was too fragile to trust in daily life. It wasn’t until we built reliable grids, invented the transformer to step voltage down, and standardized plugs and outlets that electricity became safe, universal, and invisible—woven into the very fabric of modern civilization.
Artificial intelligence today sits at a similar crossroads. The raw power is already dazzling: language models that can write, code, and reason; vision systems that see more than the human eye. But like those first electric wires, AI remains volatile, inconsistent, and hard to govern. It produces flashes of brilliance, but society cannot yet depend on it the way we depend on water or power. The real challenge is not inventing a brighter “AI lightbulb,” but building the equivalent of the grid: protocols, standards, and boundaries that turn intelligence from a laboratory marvel into a trusted public utility.
The Lesson of Electricity: From Laboratory Spectacle to Civilizational Bedrock
Electricity did not begin as infrastructure. In its early days, it was a laboratory curiosity and a spectacle at world fairs—something people gathered to witness in awe, not something they trusted in their homes. The lightbulb, the arc lamp, and the electric motor were technological marvels, but without a system around them they were fragile and dangerous. What transformed electricity from a dazzling invention into the foundation of modern life was not just brighter bulbs or bigger generators, but the creation of an entire ecosystem: standardized voltages and outlets, nationwide grids, transformers that made power safe to handle, and regulatory bodies that set rules for safety and reliability. Only when electricity became predictable, affordable, and universally accessible did it shift from “black magic” to “public utility.” This trajectory offers a direct analogy for AI today: the raw capability exists, but what matters is building the grid that makes it safe, universal, and invisible in daily life.
The State of AI Today: Impressive Demos, But Unreliable and Unevenly Distributed
Artificial intelligence today dazzles in demonstrations. A model can write essays, generate images, translate languages, or even reason about complex problems in ways that feel almost magical. Yet beneath the spectacle lies a fragile foundation. Outputs can be inconsistent—brilliant one moment, nonsensical the next. Hallucinations, bias, and lack of transparency make it difficult to trust AI in mission-critical systems like healthcare, finance, or public governance. Reliability, not raw capability, is the bottleneck.
At the same time, access is far from universal. Advanced models are concentrated in the hands of a few companies with vast compute resources. Costs remain high, APIs differ across providers, and integration requires technical skill that most organizations or individuals don’t have. Just as early electricity was confined to laboratories and exhibition halls before grids and standards made it ubiquitous, today’s AI is still a premium service, not a public utility. It dazzles in controlled settings, but it has not yet become a stable, affordable, and trusted infrastructure woven into everyday life.
The Critical Gaps: No Standards, Weak Reliability, Fuzzy Regulation, Missing Trust
For AI to evolve from a dazzling novelty into true infrastructure, four gaps must be addressed:
Lack of Standards
Unlike electricity, which achieved universality through standardized voltages, plugs, and frequencies, AI still operates in silos. Every provider uses different APIs, data formats, and integration rules. Without shared protocols, interoperability is costly and fragile.
Insufficient Reliability
Infrastructure is defined by stability—power grids must deliver consistent current, water systems must provide safe supply. AI today is unreliable: hallucinations, inconsistent performance, and opaque error modes make it unsuitable for mission-critical operations.
Blurred Regulatory Boundaries
With electricity, clear safety codes—how much voltage a line can carry, where transformers must sit, when breakers must trip—made mass adoption possible. AI has no such universally recognized boundaries. What tasks can be automated? Which require human oversight? Who is accountable when things go wrong?
Trust Not Yet Established
People flick a light switch without a second thought because decades of institutions, standards, and safeguards have earned trust. AI has not yet crossed that threshold. Until systems are verifiable, auditable, and governed transparently, society will hesitate to rely on them as a base layer.
The Necessity of Electrification: Without Standardization and Public Access, AI Will Remain in the Hands of the Few
The lesson of electricity is clear: until power was standardized and distributed as a public utility, it remained the privilege of a select few. In the late 19th century, only wealthy institutions or industrial giants could afford private generators. Ordinary households were left in the dark, excluded from the benefits of electrification. What changed history was not brighter bulbs, but the creation of public grids, common standards, and regulatory frameworks that made electricity safe, cheap, and universal.
AI today risks repeating the pre-grid era. Without shared protocols and public infrastructure, access to intelligence will be concentrated in the hands of a small group of corporations or governments with the resources to train and operate large models. This creates structural inequality: a world divided between those who can “call intelligence” at will, and those who can only be acted upon by it.
Standardization—common interfaces, transparent protocols, agreed boundaries—is the transformer and outlet system of the AI age. Publicization—broad, affordable access—ensures that intelligence becomes a common good rather than a private weapon. Without these, AI remains locked inside the server rooms of the powerful, dazzling in demonstration but unavailable as a civilizational substrate.
The choice is stark: either we build AI as shared infrastructure, or we accept a future where intelligence itself is monopolized.
Electrification Is the Only Path for AI to Become Civilizational Bedrock
Every major technology that reshaped civilization followed the same arc: it began as a spectacle, became reliable through standardization, and finally disappeared into the background as infrastructure. Electricity lit up fairs and laboratories long before it powered factories and homes. The internet started as an academic network before protocols like TCP/IP made it the backbone of the global economy.
AI now stands at the same threshold. It can remain a showcase—impressive but fragile, controlled by a handful of actors—or it can take the next step and become invisible infrastructure: safe to touch, easy to access, and universal in scope. That transition requires “electrification”: protocols to standardize, boundaries to protect, policies to distribute, and trust to anchor.
In this sense, the future of AI is not about who can build the biggest or flashiest model. It is about whether we can build the equivalent of the grid: a social, technical, and institutional system that makes intelligence as reliable and ubiquitous as electricity. Without that, AI will remain a powerful demonstration trapped in the hands of the few. With it, AI can become the unseen foundation on which the next stage of human civilization is built.
是不是根前面文章的内容有点重复了,我觉得这种趋势必然发生的吧,技术总是会走向普通人,成本越来越低,他们也需要更多人使用才能获益,如果他的属性是材料,那么自然会产品协议让大家都使用。