Thank you for this thought-provoking article. Your argument that LLMs can solve the usability crisis that plagued Web3 is a powerful and insightful one. I fully agree that the "protocol-oriented" approach is the right direction.
My key reservation, however, is that the article doesn't fully resolve the tension between the front-end and the back-end. While LLMs provide a seamless user interface, the underlying protocols would still face the fundamental limitations of current blockchain technology—namely, poor scalability and high energy costs, which are by-products of their design.
I believe your thesis points to a more nuanced conclusion: the rise of LLMs is pivotal not because it fixes everything at once, but because it might be the catalyst we've been waiting for. By bringing millions of users to the table, it could finally create a strong enough commercial and social imperative to build the next generation of truly efficient and scalable protocols.
非常有洞察力的观点。打破信息孤岛，建立通信协议，仍然需要中心化的组织来完成。
Thank you for this thought-provoking article. Your argument that LLMs can solve the usability crisis that plagued Web3 is a powerful and insightful one. I fully agree that the "protocol-oriented" approach is the right direction.
My key reservation, however, is that the article doesn't fully resolve the tension between the front-end and the back-end. While LLMs provide a seamless user interface, the underlying protocols would still face the fundamental limitations of current blockchain technology—namely, poor scalability and high energy costs, which are by-products of their design.
I believe your thesis points to a more nuanced conclusion: the rise of LLMs is pivotal not because it fixes everything at once, but because it might be the catalyst we've been waiting for. By bringing millions of users to the table, it could finally create a strong enough commercial and social imperative to build the next generation of truly efficient and scalable protocols.